Bhagna in Sushruta Samhita Chikitsa Sthana 3: The Chapter That Counts the Patient, Not the Break

इस लेख को हिंदी में पढ़ें: भग्न: सुश्रुत संहिता चिकित्सा स्थान अध्याय 3 का पाठ-परिचय

📖 25 min read · Sushruta Samhita, Chikitsa Sthana, Chapter 3, verses 1–48

Bhagna: where chapter 3 sits in the Chikitsa Sthana

The Chikitsa Sthana is the section of the Sushruta Samhita that deals with management rather than with definition or anatomy. Its first chapter, Dvivraniya, lays out the sixty measures for a vrana and the two broad kinds it recognises. The second deals with sadyo-vrana, the sudden traumatic sore, and ends on a famously bad-tempered note: the school that recognises six kinds, the text says at verse 69, does not add to the list, and those who swell it with more are merely being vainglorious, since every type they can devise falls under one of the six.

Chapter 3 follows directly, and it opens with a single line of business: Now we shall discourse on the medical treatments of fractures and dislocations (Bhagnas). The chapter runs to forty-eight verses and closes with a colophon that names its subject the same way. In this edition it occupies printed pages 279 to 288. Everything below is drawn from those ten pages and from nowhere else, and the verse numbers given are the ones printed in the margins of that text.

If you want the surrounding furniture, three other pages on this site cover it: the count of the asthi in classical anatomy, the eightfold classification of the sandhi, and the place of asthi among the dhatus. This page assumes none of them. For the place of the Samhita as a whole in the history of the subject, there is a separate overview of the Sushruta Samhita on this site.

One word for a broken asthi and a displaced sandhi

English needs two words here and Sanskrit, in this chapter, uses one. Bhagna is applied throughout to a broken asthi and equally to a sandhi that has been pushed out of its proper seat. Verse 15 speaks without any change of register of setting all dislocated (Bhagna) joints, whether fixed or movable, and the colophon at the end names the chapter's subject as both together.

This is not vagueness. The chapter is organised around what the physician does, and much of it applies whether the asthi is broken across or the sandhi has slipped. Where the two genuinely diverge — and the chapter does distinguish a sandhi that is fixed from one that is movable — the text says so in the line itself.

The eightfold classification of sandhi by shape, which the later Bhavaprakasha account sets out, is not repeated. Chapter 3 assumes the anatomy and gets on with the management.

Verse 1 names a temperament before it names a break

The opening metrical text is worth reading slowly, because of what is in it and what is not:

A fracture or dislocation (Bhagna) occurring in a person of a Vátika temperament, or of intemperate habits, or in one who is sparing in his diet, or is affected with such supervening disorders (as fever, tympanites, suppression of the stool and urine, &c.) is hard to cure.

Four conditions are listed, and every one of them is a fact about the person. A Vatika constitution is the prakriti they were born with. Intemperate habits and a sparing diet are how they live. The supervening disorders are what else they are carrying at the time. Nowhere in the line is there a word about which asthi is involved, how it broke, whether the break runs across or along, or how badly the part is displaced.

That is a striking place to begin a chapter on broken parts of the body, and it is not an accident of this one verse. Twelve verses later the chapter states the mirror image, and the mirror is just as clean.

Verse 1 opens the chapter on a temperament rather than on a break. A Vatika constitution is the first of seven variables it weighs, and none of the seven is a property of the damage itself.

Jejjata does not read the first verse; Gayi does

A footnote attaches to that very first line, and it is one word long in substance: Jejjata does not read the first verse, but Gayi does.

Two of the early commentators on the Sushruta Samhita, in other words, were working from manuscripts that did not agree about whether the chapter's opening verse belonged to the chapter at all. That is the ordinary condition of a text this old, and it is worth saying plainly on a page like this one: the classical corpus is not a single frozen object. It is a set of recensions with commentators arguing across them, and the arguments are preserved in the margins.

The commentators named in this chapter are Jejjata, Gayi (Gayadasa), and later Shiva Dasa. They appear at exactly the points where the text is doing something contestable, and this page flags each appearance. The thirty-two tantra-yuktis of the Uttara Tantra are the Samhita's own account of how such disputes are supposed to be handled.

Pathya and apathya: what the chapter sets aside

Verses 2 to 6 set out the regimen, and its structure is the familiar pathya and apathya: what is suitable and what is not. The list of things to be set aside is lavana, amla, katu and kshara — salt, acid, pungent and alkaline substances. Beyond food, the patient is to keep strict continence, avoid exposure to the sun, and give up physical exercise and parching, non-oleaginous articles of food.

What is suitable is described in one sentence: boiled rice, meat-soup, milk, clarified butter, soup of satina pulse, and other nutritive and constructive food and drink, all to be given discriminately. The register here is dietetic rather than pharmaceutical, and it belongs to the same tradition as the dhatu scheme, in which what is eaten is progressively refined into the tissues.

It is worth being careful about how an English reader takes that list. It is not a plan, and this page is not instruction. It is a description of how a physician of the classical period organised a convalescent regimen, and it sits inside a chapter whose operative passages are withheld here entirely.

The eight trees of the kusha list

In the middle of the regimen verses the chapter names a list of trees, and the list is exactly eight long: Udumbara, Madhuka, Ashvattha, Palasha, Kakubha, Vamsha (bamboo), Vata, and Shala. Their bark is the material the chapter calls kusha.

Two things are worth noticing. The list is of materials rather than of a single correct answer: any of the eight will serve, which tells you the requirement is physical rather than pharmacological. And the company the trees keep is not random. Udumbara, Ashvattha and Vata are the three great figs; Kakubha is better known as Arjuna; Shala is the sal. These are the longest-lived trees of the Indian plain, and several reappear in the Nyagrodhadi group a few verses later.

The eight are named and then not discussed again. The chapter does not say how the material is prepared, shaped or applied, and this page does not fill that silence.

The chapter names eight trees in a single breath and then never returns to them. Several of the same trees reappear a few verses later inside the Nyagrodhadi group.

Manjishtha, madhuka and shata-dhauta ghrita

Immediately after the tree list the chapter names a second set of materials: Manjishtha, Madhuka, red sandal wood and shali rice, mixed with shata-dhauta clarified butter. The translator glosses the last term in the line itself — clarified butter washed one hundred times in succession.

Shata-dhauta ghrita is one of the more distinctive preparations in the classical repertoire, and the name is literal: the same quantity of ghrita is worked with water and the water discarded, over and over, a hundred times. It appears across the corpus wherever a cooling, non-irritating base is wanted. Manjishtha and red sandal are both strongly coloured and both belong to the cooling group; shali rice supplies the body of the preparation.

This is a formulation, and the page names it without carrying it. The proportions, the method and the application are all in the text and none of them are here.

The milk question splits four ways

A second footnote hangs off the word milk in the diet list, and it is the longest note in the chapter. Unpacked, it records four positions:

1. The general rule of the corpus is that milk is not given to a patient carrying a vrana — but a case of bhagna is an exception to that rule.
2. Some authorities allow tepid milk to such a patient, provided there is no vrana present.
3. Others hold that milk should not be given in any case, for fear of paka — suppuration — setting in.
4. Others again read the printed kshira-sarpih as a compound word, so that the text is not prescribing milk at all but clarified butter made from milk, as distinguished from the kind made from curd.

The fourth position is the most interesting, because it is not a disagreement about physiology. It is a disagreement about grammar. Whether the chapter recommends milk turns on whether two Sanskrit words are read as one, and the physiological dispute in positions 1 to 3 exists only if you read them as two.

The editor of this edition then adds a fifth voice of his own, noting that in cases of excessive weakness or emaciation, milk may be given without hesitation. Five readings of one word, in a footnote, in a chapter about broken bones.

The dressing interval runs on the season

Verses 7 and 8 carry the heading Bandage in this edition, and they contain the chapter's first clock. The interval between one dressing and the next is given verbatim as once a week in cold weather, on every fifth day in temperate weather (i.e., in spring and autumn), and on every fourth day in hot weather (i.e., in summer) — three bands, set out as a table:

Three things follow. The interval shortens as the weather warms, which fits the concern about paka the chapter returns to at its end. The bands are seasonal rather than calendrical, and the text glosses which ritus it means. And the table is at once made subordinate to the individual case: if the doshas say otherwise, the doshas decide.

It is worth registering what is absent. The interval does not vary with which part of the body is involved, or with how severe the injury is. Season and dosha are the only two variables offered.

Verses 7 and 8 set the interval between one dressing and the next by the weather alone: once a week in cold, every fifth day in temperate, every fourth in heat.

A sentence that names a pair it does not use

The second half of verse 8 states the classic problem of any dressing, and in this translation it does something odd. The printed sentence reads: an extremely loose bandage prevents the firm adhesion of a fractured bone, while a light bandage gives rise to pain, swelling and suppuration of the local skin. The conclusion then follows: experts prefer a bandage which is neither too tight nor too loose.

The conclusion names a pair — too tight against too loose — that the middle clause does not use. As the sentence is printed, loose and light would have to mean opposite things, since one is blamed for a failure of adhesion and the other for pain and paka. The conclusion tells you which pair the argument actually rests on, and the reading that makes the whole sentence cohere is the obvious one.

We are flagging this as a feature of the English rendering, not as an error in the Sanskrit, which we have not examined. It is the same class of observation this site has had to make before, most recently where an English sentence dropped a material its own verse had listed. When a translated sentence contradicts itself, the conclusion usually preserves what the middle lost.

Nyagrodhadi, the lesser panchamula and chakra-taila

Verses 9 and 10 are headed Washings and name three options, graded by circumstance. The default is a cold decoction of the Nyagrodhadi group. Where there is excessive pain, the text moves to milk boiled with the drugs of the lesser panchamula, or to the oil called chakra-taila, made lukewarm. A footnote pins down when the warm option applies: in winter, and where the aching is due to Vayu and Kapha.

The Nyagrodhadi group is named for the nyagrodhakashaya in taste and cooling in action.

After the washes come the pradehas: applications of dosha-subduing materials, cold or warm, with due regard to the nature of the season and the Doshas involved in each case. That closing formula is the same one that governed the dressing interval, and it will govern the next clock too.

Prognosis: the young, the barely disturbed, and winter

Verses 13 and 14 carry the heading Prognosis, and the first sentence is the exact mirror of verse 1:

A case of fracture occurring in a youth or a person with slightly deranged Doshas or in winter, is held to be easily curable (with the help of the aforesaid medicines and diet).

Verse 1 gave four adverse conditions; this gives three favourable ones. Put the two lists side by side and you have seven variables in total: prakriti, habits, diet, concurrent disorder, age, the state of the doshas, and the season. Not one of the seven is a property of the break.

This is the observation the whole page is built around, and it is worth being precise about its limits. The chapter is perfectly capable of distinguishing kinds of damage — it names a cracked sphutita and a bruised pichchita state in a later verse, and it separates a case with a vrana on the part from a simple one at verses 11 to 12. What it never does is use any of those distinctions to set a prognosis or a timetable. For that, it reaches only for facts about the person.

One month, two months, three months

The second half of the same verse gives the chapter's second clock, and it is the cleanest thing in the ten pages:

A fractured bone in a youth is joined by the aforesaid treatment in the course of a month, in two months in the case of a middle-aged man and in three months in one of old age.

One, two, three. Three age bands, three months, a single step between each. The chapter does not distinguish a small asthi from a large one, an upper limb from a lower, or a clean break from a comminuted one. Age alone sets the expected time to union.

Whether the ratio holds is not the point, and this page makes no claim about it. What is worth recording is the form: one variable, three bands, an even step. That shape is a teaching device, built to be memorised in a tradition where the chapter was learnt by heart before it was ever applied.

Verses 13 and 14 index the expected time to union on age and on nothing else - one month, then two, then three.

Two clocks, running in opposite directions

Set the two tables next to each other and something falls out that neither verse states on its own.

The two are not in tension, because they are answering different questions. The dressing interval is governed by the risk the chapter is most afraid of, which is paka: heat accelerates it, so the dressing is disturbed more often when it is hot. The time to union is governed by the patient's capacity to build asthi, which the tradition holds declines with age.

Read together, they say something coherent about how the chapter models a broken body. The external management tracks the environment. The internal repair tracks the person. And the injury itself, which is the one thing a modern classification would start from, is not a variable in either equation.

Anchhana, pidana, sankshepa, vandhana

Verses 15 and 16 give the chapter its technical vocabulary. An intelligent physician, the text says, should set all displaced bhagna joints, whether fixed or movable, by the mode of reduction known as Anchhana, Pidana (pressure), Sankshepa, and Vandhana (bandaging).

Four named operations, given as a set. They are, in the order the text lists them, a drawing action, a pressing action, a bringing-together action, and a binding action. That is as far as this page will go with them: the chapter's own descriptions of how each is performed, and on which part, are withheld here.

What can be said safely is structural. The four are presented as a single named mode rather than as four alternatives, and the sentence covers both a fixed and a movable sandhi without splitting the list. The same four-part vocabulary is what the instrument chapters of the other Samhitas presuppose — the yantra chapter of the Ashtanga Hridaya catalogues the devices, and its companion chapter the sharp instruments.

Four displacements answered one for one

Immediately before it names the four modes, the chapter lists four ways a part can sit wrong: elevated, hanging down, pushed aside, and lowered from its proper place. Each is given its own correction, and the correspondence is one for one — four wrong positions, four answers, in the same order.

The symmetry is almost certainly the point. Verses meant to be memorised are built this way, and the listener who has the four displacements has the four corrections without needing a second list. It is the same mnemonic architecture visible in the sixty measures of chapter 1, where the count itself does the organising work.

Verses 17 to 19 then add the principle that governs all four: a crushed or displaced sandhi should not be shaken, which the translator glosses as being kept at rest. Rest, cold applications and pradeha are the standing background; the four modes are the intervention against it.

The translator glosses two of the four

Look again at how the four names are printed. Pidana is given a parenthetical gloss, pressure. Vandhana is given one too, bandaging. Anchhana and Sankshepa are printed bare.

The translator, in other words, glossed half the list and left half untranslated — and the half he left is the half that is hardest to render into a single English word. This is a small thing, but it is the kind of small thing that tells you where a technical vocabulary resists translation. A word for pressure and a word for binding have obvious English equivalents. A word for the specific drawing action used in reduction, and a word for the bringing of two parts into apposition, do not.

Two of the four terms therefore reach an English reader only as sounds. This page keeps all four in Sanskrit for that reason, and supplies no gloss the edition itself declined to give.

The limb-by-limb section, and what this page withholds

From verse 20 the chapter changes gear: Now we shall discourse on the measures to be adopted in fractures occurring in each particular limb. What follows is the longest stretch of the ten pages, and it works down and across the body. The seats it names, in order, are the nail-joint, the finger, the foot, the knee, the thigh, the kati, the parshvaka, the shoulder, the elbow, the knee again, the ankle, the wrist, the palms, the akshaka, the arm, the neck, the hanu, a loosened tooth, the nose, the ear, and the bone of the forehead.

What is safe, and genuinely interesting, is the shape of the section. It runs anatomically rather than by severity, gives the smallest structures first, and puts the hanu, the tooth, the nose and the ear on the same footing as the rest — so this chapter's bhagna covers any hard structure that can be displaced or broken, not only the long asthi.

Kati-bhagna: the one the book both abandons and works on

At the kati passage a footnote opens a genuine conflict inside the Samhita. The note records that in the Nidana Sthana, chapter 15, verse 9, it is stated that a case of bhagna in the kati should be given up — varjjayet. Chapter 3, meanwhile, is in the middle of describing what to do about one.

The same book, in two places, both abandons the case and works on it. And the resolution offered is not a reconciliation of the two passages but a re-reading of a single word:

Jejjata, however, explains Varjjayet as hard to cure.

It is worth noting that this is the second time on this page a dispute has been settled by reading rather than by evidence. The milk question turned on whether two words are one; the kati question turns on whether a verb is an order or a forecast. The Nidana Sthana's own sixteen chapters are where the classification side of that argument lives.

Kanda-bhagna: a union that sets wrong

Near the end of the limb section the chapter names a distinct problem: kanda-bhagna, described in the translation as a faulty union of a broken asthi lying between two sandhis. The chapter's response is stated in a single clause, and this page will paraphrase it rather than quote it: the faulty union is not accepted, and the part is brought back to the state of an ordinary fresh case before being managed again.

It is a striking thing to find in a text of this date, because it presupposes three judgements: that a union can be complete and still be wrong; that wrongness is worth undoing; and that the cost of undoing it is worth paying. The four signs that close the chapter are what make the first possible — a test a part can fail even after it has joined.

A second passage in the same stretch deals with an asthi that has come out through an ulcerated part and dried. Again the method is withheld here. Both passages are named to show the range of the chapter, not to be followed.

Gandha-taila: a calendar, not a recipe

Verses 44 and 45 give the chapter's set-piece preparation, gandha-taila, and the most remarkable thing about it is its length. The base is black sesame, and before it ever reaches a fire it goes through four weeks of processing, one week at a time:

Only then does the compounding start, with yashtimadhu, manjishtha, the Kakolyadi group, sariva, kushtha, sarja-rasa, mansi, devadaru, red chandana and shatapushpa; and after that a second cooking with a long list that includes ela, shalaparni, tejapatra, jivaka, tagara, rodhra, prapaundarika, saireyaka, kshira-vidari, ananta and madhulika.

The quantities, the sequence of the cooking and the uses are all in the text and none of them are reproduced here. What the calendar shows is the scale of the investment: this is a preparation that cannot be improvised, and a physician who wanted it had to have begun a month before it was needed.

The verses go on to attribute a long list of properties to the finished oil, including a number of named disorders and several claims about appearance and breath. Those are the text's claims about its own preparation, made in the idiom of the period, and they are recorded here as such — not as anything established, and not instruction. The line that closes the passage is the most human thing in the chapter: it may be used even by kings, and for them it should be specially prepared.

The commentators disagree from the first line onward. Jejjata does not read the opening verse of this chapter; Gayi does.

Shiva Dasa says four parts; the text says three

A footnote to the gandha-taila passage records the third commentarial dispute of the chapter, and this one is arithmetical. The received proportion sets three parts of the sesame powder against one part of the combined powders of yashtimadhu, manjishtha, Kakolyadi and the rest. Shiva Dasa holds that four parts of the sesame powder should be taken.

Three to one, or four to one. It is a twenty-five per cent difference in the concentration of everything that is not sesame, and it is recorded without adjudication — the note simply states both and moves on.

That refusal to decide is characteristic. In ten pages this chapter has declined to settle whether verse 1 belongs to it, whether milk may be given, whether a kati case is forbidden or merely difficult, and what the proportion of its principal preparation should be. A text trying to sound authoritative would have resolved all four; this one preserves the argument, and a reader centuries later can still see both sides.

Paka is the complication the chapter fears

Verse 47 names the thing the physician is to guard against most strenuously. This page uses the chapter's own word, paka, for it. The text is blunt about why: once it has set in around the local siras, snayus and mamsa, the situation becomes difficult.

That single sentence explains a great deal of what came earlier. It is why the dressing interval shortens as the weather warms. It is why a dressing that is too tight is blamed for pain, swelling and paka together. It is why one school refuses milk outright. And it is why a case already carrying a vrana on the part is handled separately at verses 11 to 12 rather than folded into the general instructions.

The anatomy the sentence assumes is set out elsewhere in the corpus — the account of the snayu and dhamani, the account of the kandara, and the rules for the siras. The layering that puts those structures at different depths is set out in the same Samhita's account of the seven layers. Chapter 3 assumes all of it in one clause.

The four signs of a complete union

The chapter ends on a test, and the test is the best-constructed thing in it. A complete union, verses 47 to 48 say, is to be inferred from four signs:

Every one of the four is something the part does or shows, and not one of them is a statement about the interior. Two are functional — it does not hurt, and it moves freely through its range. Two are about form — nothing detectable remains, and the contour is even. A physician with no way to see inside the body has built a test entirely out of what can be observed from outside, and has made it a conjunction: all four, not any one.

It also gives the chapter its internal logic. The four signs are what make kanda-bhagna a coherent category, because they describe a state a part can fail to reach even after it has joined. Define a good union carefully enough and you have simultaneously defined a bad one.

What we did not find in this chapter

It is as useful to record what ten pages do not contain as what they do, and on several counts we did not find what a reader might reasonably expect.

• No classification of kinds of bhagna. The numbered taxonomy of fracture and dislocation types that the tradition is known for is not in this chapter; chapter 3 is management, and the classification sits in the Nidana Sthana, which is not in the volume we worked from. We have therefore not reproduced it, and we have not cited it.
• No count. Unlike almost every neighbouring chapter, this one names no total — no number of types, seats or stages. The only numbers in it are the two clocks, the four modes, the four displacements, the four signs and the eight trees.
• No prognosis drawn from the injury. Discussed at length above. Seven prognostic variables, none of them about the break.
• No mention of the marma scheme. Given that displaced sandhis and broken asthi are being discussed throughout, the absence of any cross-reference to the marma points is notable. The chapter stays in its own register.

On search demand we will be equally plain. We checked Google Search Console for this site across the last ninety days: bhagna returns no rows at all, and the related Sanskrit terms in this chapter return none either. That means the volume is unknown, not low — an absence of impressions for a page that does not yet exist is not evidence about demand. What does have measurable demand on this site is the chapter-and-text query form, and the terms for classical anatomy that this page links out to. We have not estimated a number for anything, and we do not have one.

From our shelf

A short note on what we make, kept deliberately separate from everything above. Ayurveda Hub is a small Indian maker of everyday bathing and grooming preparations. We work in small batches from plant and mineral ingredients, without synthetic fragrance, without synthetic colour, and without a great deal of packaging. Nothing we sell is a medicine, and nothing we sell is being offered here as one. The daily bar below is simply the sort of plain, honest thing a great many households in this country have always kept by the bucket: something made of recognisable stuff, for washing with at the end of the day. If none of that is of any interest to you, please skip it. The reading above stands perfectly well on its own without it, and we would rather you had the reading.

That is the whole of the sales pitch and we will leave it there. We would rather be useful to you than persuasive: if you came here for the reading and leave having bought nothing at all, that is a perfectly good outcome from where we sit, and these pages are written on that basis.

More to read on this topic

Frequently asked questions

Shop all Ayurveda Hub preparations →